Bashir would have bowled better than Jacks - Tufnell

BBC NaN days ago
Shoaib Bashir bowls in the nets
Image source, Getty Images

Shoaib Bashir would have bowled better than Will Jacks in the third Ashes Test, according to ex-England spinner Phil Tufnell.

Jacks has been ineffective in Adelaide, returning 3-212 from his 39 overs on a pitch which is already offering turn for the spinners.

England preferred Surrey all-rounder Jacks over 22-year-old Bashir, who has taken 69 Test wickets since being identified as the kind of bowler England might need down under.

"Everybody knows at Adelaide you play a spinner," Tufnell told BBC Test Match Special.

"I can understand not playing a spinner at Perth and perhaps not playing a spinner at Brisbane.

"To not play a full-time recognised spin bowler in Adelaide - I think there is a bit of clogging up with selection.

"I'm not having a go at Will Jacks because he has not got the tools to do it. But why has Bashir become unselectable?

"If Bashir is not going to play here, why is he here in the first place? No disrespect to Jacks, but Bashir would have bowled better than Jacks. He is a bowler, and it is in his blood."

Another former England spinner, Graeme Swann, agreed and said any excuses that the domestic system is to blame for a lack of options is wrong.

"The excuse is always rolled out that spinners can't bowl at the start and the end of the season," said Swann, speaking on TNT Sports.

"I think it's a soft excuse. If you can't bowl at all times, find a role for yourself as the spinner in the team or you won't get picked.

"They don't bowl but that is more to do with the way they're captained and fields are set that doesn't allow them to get overs under their belt.

"The way spin is viewed in England is fundamentally wrong in county cricket and has been for a long time.

"I grew up having to bowl early season and squeeze out 15 overs and try to find a way, not having the excuse of 'it's April so we can't play spin'."